Back to Blog
refactoringmicroservicesarchitectureai agentsmigration

From Monolith to Microservices: How AI Assists Large-Scale Refactoring

A practical guide to using AI agents for decomposing monolithic applications into microservices—safely and incrementally.

B
Bootspring Team
Engineering
February 18, 2026
7 min read

Migrating from a monolith to microservices is one of the riskiest endeavors in software engineering. It's expensive, time-consuming, and full of surprises. AI agents can help reduce that risk—not by doing the migration for you, but by handling the tedious analysis and transformation work.

Why Migrations Fail#

Most monolith-to-microservices migrations fail for predictable reasons:

  1. Poor boundary identification: Services are cut incorrectly
  2. Hidden dependencies: Connections discovered too late
  3. Data migration complexity: Shared databases are hard to split
  4. Testing gaps: Not enough tests to validate changes
  5. Big bang approach: Trying to do everything at once

AI can help with all of these.

Phase 1: Dependency Analysis#

Before cutting anything, understand what you have.

Automated Dependency Mapping#

AI analyzes your codebase to create a dependency graph:

1// AI-powered analysis 2const analysis = await aiAgent.analyzeMonolith({ 3 entryPoint: './src', 4 output: './analysis' 5}); 6 7// Output structure 8{ 9 "modules": { 10 "users": { 11 "files": ["src/users/**/*.ts"], 12 "internalDependencies": ["utils", "database"], 13 "externalDependencies": ["bcrypt", "jsonwebtoken"], 14 "dependsOn": ["database"], 15 "usedBy": ["orders", "notifications", "billing"] 16 }, 17 "orders": { 18 "files": ["src/orders/**/*.ts"], 19 "internalDependencies": ["users", "products", "database"], 20 "externalDependencies": ["stripe"], 21 "dependsOn": ["users", "products", "database"], 22 "usedBy": ["notifications", "analytics"] 23 } 24 // ... more modules 25 }, 26 "circularDependencies": [ 27 ["users", "billing", "users"] 28 ], 29 "suggestedBoundaries": [ 30 { 31 "service": "user-service", 32 "modules": ["users", "auth"], 33 "reason": "Cohesive user identity domain" 34 } 35 ] 36}

Visualizing the Architecture#

AI generates architecture diagrams:

1graph TD 2 A[API Gateway] --> B[Users Module] 3 A --> C[Orders Module] 4 A --> D[Products Module] 5 6 B --> E[(Users DB)] 7 C --> E 8 C --> F[(Orders DB)] 9 D --> E 10 D --> G[(Products DB)] 11 12 C --> B 13 C --> D 14 15 style B fill:#f9f,stroke:#333 16 style C fill:#bbf,stroke:#333 17 style D fill:#bfb,stroke:#333

Phase 2: Boundary Identification#

AI suggests service boundaries based on:

  • Code cohesion analysis
  • Data access patterns
  • Business domain alignment
  • Change frequency correlation
1const boundaries = await aiAgent.suggestServiceBoundaries({ 2 codebase: './src', 3 strategy: 'domain-driven', 4 constraints: { 5 maxServicesFirstPhase: 5, 6 minimumCohesion: 0.7, 7 avoidCircularDependencies: true 8 } 9}); 10 11// AI output 12{ 13 "recommendations": [ 14 { 15 "serviceName": "identity-service", 16 "modules": ["users", "auth", "sessions"], 17 "rationale": "User identity is a bounded context with clear inputs/outputs", 18 "estimatedComplexity": "medium", 19 "dependencies": [], 20 "dependents": ["orders", "notifications", "billing"], 21 "dataStores": ["users table", "sessions table"], 22 "apis": [ 23 "POST /auth/login", 24 "POST /auth/register", 25 "GET /users/:id" 26 ] 27 }, 28 { 29 "serviceName": "order-service", 30 "modules": ["orders", "cart", "checkout"], 31 "rationale": "Order lifecycle is self-contained after user identity", 32 "estimatedComplexity": "high", 33 "dependencies": ["identity-service", "product-service"], 34 "dependents": ["notification-service", "analytics-service"], 35 "dataStores": ["orders table", "order_items table", "cart table"], 36 "apis": [ 37 "POST /orders", 38 "GET /orders/:id", 39 "PATCH /orders/:id/status" 40 ] 41 } 42 ], 43 "extractionOrder": [ 44 "identity-service", // No dependencies, extract first 45 "product-service", // Only depends on identity 46 "order-service", // Depends on identity and products 47 "notification-service" // Depends on orders 48 ], 49 "warnings": [ 50 "orders module has tight coupling to users via 15 direct imports", 51 "Shared utility functions need to be extracted to shared library" 52 ] 53}

Phase 3: Strangler Pattern Implementation#

AI helps implement the strangler fig pattern—wrapping the monolith and gradually replacing pieces.

Creating the Facade#

1// AI generates facade layer 2// src/facades/user-facade.ts 3 4import { User } from '@/types'; 5import { config } from '@/config'; 6 7export class UserFacade { 8 private useNewService = config.features.useNewUserService; 9 10 async getUser(id: string): Promise<User> { 11 if (this.useNewService) { 12 // Call new microservice 13 return this.callNewService(id); 14 } else { 15 // Call monolith 16 return this.callMonolith(id); 17 } 18 } 19 20 private async callNewService(id: string): Promise<User> { 21 const response = await fetch(`${config.userServiceUrl}/users/${id}`); 22 return response.json(); 23 } 24 25 private async callMonolith(id: string): Promise<User> { 26 // Import from monolith codebase 27 const { UserService } = await import('@/services/users'); 28 return UserService.getById(id); 29 } 30}

Feature Flag Configuration#

1// AI generates feature flag setup 2const featureConfig = { 3 useNewUserService: { 4 default: false, 5 rollout: { 6 percentage: 0, 7 enabledFor: ['internal-users', 'beta-testers'] 8 } 9 }, 10 useNewOrderService: { 11 default: false, 12 rollout: { 13 percentage: 0, 14 blockedBy: ['useNewUserService'] // Must enable users first 15 } 16 } 17};

Phase 4: Code Transformation#

AI handles the tedious transformation work:

Extracting Service Code#

1// Before: Monolith code 2// src/services/users.ts 3import { db } from '@/lib/database'; 4import { hashPassword } from '@/utils/crypto'; 5import { sendEmail } from '@/services/email'; 6 7export class UserService { 8 static async create(data: CreateUserInput) { 9 const hashedPassword = await hashPassword(data.password); 10 const user = await db.user.create({ 11 data: { ...data, password: hashedPassword } 12 }); 13 await sendEmail(user.email, 'welcome'); 14 return user; 15 } 16} 17 18// After: AI extracts to microservice 19// user-service/src/user.service.ts 20import { db } from './database'; 21import { hashPassword } from './crypto'; 22import { publishEvent } from './events'; 23 24export class UserService { 25 static async create(data: CreateUserInput) { 26 const hashedPassword = await hashPassword(data.password); 27 const user = await db.user.create({ 28 data: { ...data, password: hashedPassword } 29 }); 30 31 // Event-driven instead of direct call 32 await publishEvent('user.created', { userId: user.id }); 33 34 return user; 35 } 36}

Generating API Contracts#

AI creates OpenAPI specs from existing code:

1# Generated by AI from code analysis 2openapi: 3.0.0 3info: 4 title: User Service API 5 version: 1.0.0 6 7paths: 8 /users: 9 post: 10 summary: Create a new user 11 requestBody: 12 required: true 13 content: 14 application/json: 15 schema: 16 $ref: '#/components/schemas/CreateUserInput' 17 responses: 18 '201': 19 description: User created 20 content: 21 application/json: 22 schema: 23 $ref: '#/components/schemas/User' 24 25components: 26 schemas: 27 CreateUserInput: 28 type: object 29 required: [email, password, name] 30 properties: 31 email: 32 type: string 33 format: email 34 password: 35 type: string 36 minLength: 8 37 name: 38 type: string 39 User: 40 type: object 41 properties: 42 id: 43 type: string 44 email: 45 type: string 46 name: 47 type: string 48 createdAt: 49 type: string 50 format: date-time

Phase 5: Testing Migration#

AI generates tests to validate the migration:

Contract Tests#

1// AI-generated contract tests 2describe('User Service Contract', () => { 3 describe('GET /users/:id', () => { 4 it('returns user matching monolith response shape', async () => { 5 const userId = 'test-user-id'; 6 7 // Get from monolith 8 const monolithResponse = await monolith.get(`/users/${userId}`); 9 10 // Get from microservice 11 const microserviceResponse = await microservice.get(`/users/${userId}`); 12 13 // Compare shapes (ignore timestamps) 14 expect(microserviceResponse.data).toMatchObject({ 15 id: monolithResponse.data.id, 16 email: monolithResponse.data.email, 17 name: monolithResponse.data.name 18 }); 19 }); 20 }); 21});

Data Consistency Tests#

1// Verify data sync between old and new systems 2describe('Data Consistency', () => { 3 it('maintains user count consistency', async () => { 4 const monolithCount = await monolithDb.user.count(); 5 const microserviceCount = await microserviceDb.user.count(); 6 7 expect(microserviceCount).toBe(monolithCount); 8 }); 9 10 it('maintains data integrity for sample users', async () => { 11 const sampleIds = await getSampleUserIds(100); 12 13 for (const id of sampleIds) { 14 const monolithUser = await monolithDb.user.findUnique({ where: { id }}); 15 const microserviceUser = await microserviceDb.user.findUnique({ where: { id }}); 16 17 expect(microserviceUser).toMatchObject({ 18 id: monolithUser.id, 19 email: monolithUser.email, 20 name: monolithUser.name 21 }); 22 } 23 }); 24});

Phase 6: Gradual Rollout#

AI monitors the rollout and suggests adjustments:

1// AI rollout assistant 2const rolloutAnalysis = await aiAgent.analyzeRollout({ 3 service: 'user-service', 4 currentPercentage: 10, 5 metrics: await getMetrics() 6}); 7 8// AI output 9{ 10 "status": "healthy", 11 "recommendation": "increase_rollout", 12 "suggestedPercentage": 25, 13 "rationale": [ 14 "Error rate is 0.01% (below 0.1% threshold)", 15 "P99 latency is 45ms (below 100ms threshold)", 16 "No data consistency alerts in past 24h" 17 ], 18 "watchItems": [ 19 "Monitor database connection pool as traffic increases", 20 "Order service latency increased 5ms - likely due to network hop" 21 ] 22}

The Human Decisions#

AI handles the grunt work, but humans make the critical decisions:

You Decide#

  • Which services to extract first: Based on business priority
  • Service boundaries: AI suggests, you validate against domain knowledge
  • Rollout speed: Based on risk tolerance
  • When to cut over: Based on confidence level

AI Handles#

  • Dependency analysis
  • Code transformation
  • Test generation
  • Contract creation
  • Monitoring and alerting

Success Metrics#

Track these throughout your migration:

MetricHealthyWarningCritical
Error rate increase<0.1%0.1-0.5%>0.5%
Latency increase<10ms10-50ms>50ms
Data consistency100%99.9%<99.9%
Test coverage>80%60-80%<60%

Conclusion#

Migrating from monolith to microservices is still hard. AI doesn't change that. But it does change how much time you spend on tedious analysis and transformation versus actual architecture decisions.

Use AI for the grunt work. Keep humans on the strategy.


Bootspring's refactoring agents help teams migrate safely. See how we've helped companies extract services without downtime.

Share this article

Help spread the word about Bootspring