Back to Blog
EthicsAIIndustry TrendsBest Practices

The Ethics of AI in Software Development: A Practical Framework

Navigate the ethical considerations of using AI in software development, from code ownership to job displacement, with practical guidance.

B
Bootspring Team
Product
August 12, 2025
6 min read

AI-assisted development raises important ethical questions. Who owns AI-generated code? What happens to developer jobs? How do we ensure AI doesn't perpetuate harmful patterns? This guide provides a practical framework for navigating these issues.

Code Ownership and Attribution#

The Attribution Question#

When AI generates code, who deserves credit?

Scenarios to consider:

  • AI generates function based on your detailed prompt
  • AI completes code you started
  • AI provides entire module from brief description
  • AI suggests optimization you wouldn't have found

Practical approach:

  1. AI is a tool, like a compiler or IDE
  2. The human directing the AI owns the output
  3. Document AI assistance in significant cases
  4. Follow your organization's policy

Licensing Concerns#

AI models trained on open-source code raise licensing questions:

Considerations: - Was the AI trained on GPL code? - Does output constitute derivative work? - Are you comfortable with uncertainty? Mitigations: - Use AI for ideas, rewrite implementations - Run output through license detection tools - Consult legal for critical projects - Document your due diligence

Best Practice#

1## AI Assistance Documentation 2 3This codebase uses AI coding assistants for: 4- Code completion and suggestions 5- Documentation generation 6- Test writing 7- Code review assistance 8 9Human developers review and approve all AI-generated code. 10All code is subject to standard review processes.

Job Displacement Concerns#

The Reality#

AI changes jobs more than it eliminates them:

  • Historical pattern: Tools increase productivity, shift focus
  • Current impact: Less boilerplate, more design and architecture
  • Future trajectory: Higher-level work, AI orchestration

Skills That Remain Valuable#

Despite AI advancement:

  1. System design: Understanding how pieces fit together
  2. Problem decomposition: Breaking complex problems into solvable parts
  3. Critical evaluation: Judging AI output quality
  4. Domain expertise: Understanding the business context
  5. Communication: Explaining technical concepts to stakeholders

Adapting Your Career#

Strategies for AI-era development: 1. Learn to work WITH AI effectively - Prompt engineering - Output evaluation - AI orchestration 2. Move up the abstraction ladder - Architecture and design - System thinking - Integration planning 3. Develop uniquely human skills - Stakeholder communication - Ethical judgment - Creative problem-solving 4. Stay current with AI capabilities - Understand what AI can/can't do - Know when to use which tools - Anticipate industry shifts

Quality and Safety#

AI-Generated Code Risks#

AI can produce code that:

  • Looks correct but has subtle bugs
  • Contains security vulnerabilities
  • Doesn't handle edge cases
  • Reflects outdated patterns

Quality Assurance Framework#

Required for AI-generated code: 1. Code review □ Logic verification □ Security review □ Edge case analysis □ Performance consideration 2. Testing □ Unit tests (also AI-assisted) □ Integration tests □ Security tests □ Edge case coverage 3. Documentation □ AI assistance noted □ Human verification recorded □ Unusual patterns explained 4. Monitoring □ Error tracking □ Performance monitoring □ Security scanning

Bias and Fairness#

AI Perpetuating Bias#

AI trained on existing code may perpetuate:

  • Non-inclusive variable names
  • Assumptions about user demographics
  • Accessibility oversights
  • Cultural biases in examples

Mitigation Strategies#

1. Review for inclusivity - Variable names and comments - Example data and test cases - Assumptions about users 2. Explicit prompting "Generate code that: - Uses inclusive language - Handles internationalization - Considers accessibility - Avoids demographic assumptions" 3. Diverse review - Include varied perspectives - Check assumptions about users - Test with diverse scenarios

Environmental Impact#

Computational Costs#

AI assistance has environmental costs:

  • Training large models requires significant energy
  • Inference (using models) adds up at scale
  • Data centers have environmental footprints

Balancing Benefits#

Consider: - AI may reduce overall development time - Fewer iterations = less total compute - More efficient code from AI suggestions - Tradeoffs vary by use case Practical steps: - Use smaller models when sufficient - Batch AI requests when possible - Choose efficient tools - Be mindful of unnecessary queries

Privacy and Data#

What AI Sees#

Consider what data flows through AI systems:

  • Code snippets
  • Comments and documentation
  • Error messages
  • Configuration (potentially secrets)

Privacy Framework#

Data handling checklist: Before using AI: □ Remove sensitive data from prompts □ Never include credentials □ Strip PII from examples □ Consider proprietary algorithm exposure Tool selection: □ Understand data retention policies □ Consider on-premises options for sensitive work □ Use enterprise tiers with data protection □ Review vendor security certifications

Transparency#

With Stakeholders#

Be open about AI usage:

1## Development Practices 2 3Our development process includes: 4- AI-assisted coding tools 5- Automated code review 6- AI-generated documentation 7 8All code undergoes human review and testing. 9AI tools augment but don't replace developer judgment.

In Code#

Document significant AI contributions:

1/** 2 * Calculates optimal shipping route. 3 * 4 * Algorithm: Modified Dijkstra's with traffic weighting. 5 * Note: Initial implementation AI-assisted, verified and 6 * optimized by engineering team. 7 */ 8function calculateRoute(origin: Location, destination: Location): Route { 9 // Implementation 10}

Decision Framework#

When facing AI ethics questions, ask:

1. Transparency Test#

Would I be comfortable if stakeholders knew exactly how AI was used here?

2. Quality Test#

Am I confident this code meets our standards, regardless of origin?

3. Accountability Test#

Can I explain and defend this code if problems arise?

4. Fairness Test#

Does this code treat all users equitably?

5. Sustainability Test#

Is this approach sustainable for my team and organization?

Organizational Guidelines#

Creating AI Usage Policy#

1# AI Development Tool Policy 2 3## Approved Uses 4- Code completion and suggestions 5- Documentation generation 6- Test writing assistance 7- Code review support 8- Learning and exploration 9 10## Requirements 11- All AI-generated code must be reviewed 12- No credentials or PII in prompts 13- Document significant AI contributions 14- Follow standard testing requirements 15 16## Prohibited Uses 17- Generating code for security-critical systems without extra review 18- Including proprietary algorithms in prompts 19- Bypassing code review for AI-generated code 20 21## Training 22All developers must complete AI ethics training.

Conclusion#

AI in software development isn't inherently ethical or unethical—it's a tool whose impact depends on how we use it. The developers and organizations that thrive will be those who:

  1. Use AI to augment, not replace, human judgment
  2. Maintain quality standards regardless of code origin
  3. Remain transparent about AI usage
  4. Stay current with evolving best practices
  5. Consider impacts on stakeholders, users, and society

The ethical path isn't avoiding AI—it's using it responsibly. With thoughtful practices, AI-assisted development can be both effective and ethical.

Share this article

Help spread the word about Bootspring